Post a Free Blog

Submit A Press Release

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Action
Animation
ATP Tour (ATP)
Auto Racing
Baseball
Basketball
Boxing
Breaking News
Business
Business
Business Newsletter
Call of Duty (CALLOFDUTY)
Canadian Football League (CFL)
Car
Celebrity
Champions Tour (CHAMP)
Comedy
CONCACAF
Counter Strike Global Offensive (CSGO)
Crime
Dark Comedy
Defense of the Ancients (DOTA)
Documentary and Foreign
Drama
eSports
European Tour (EPGA)
Fashion
FIFA
FIFA Women’s World Cup (WWC)
FIFA World Cup (FIFA)
Fighting
Football
Formula 1 (F1)
Fortnite
Golf
Health
Hockey
Horror
IndyCar Series (INDY)
International Friendly (FRIENDLY)
Kids & Family
League of Legends (LOL)
LPGA
Madden
Major League Baseball (MLB)
Mixed Martial Arts (MMA)
MLS
Movie and Music
Movie Trailers
Music
Mystery
NASCAR Cup Series (NAS)
National Basketball Association (NBA)
National Football League (NFL)
National Hockey League (NHL)
National Women's Soccer (NWSL)
NBA Development League (NBAGL)
NBA2K
NCAA Baseball (NCAABBL)
NCAA Basketball (NCAAB)
NCAA Football (NCAAF)
NCAA Hockey (NCAAH)
Olympic Mens (OLYHKYM)
Other
Other Sports
Overwatch
PGA
Politics
Premier League (PREM)
Romance
Sci-Fi
Science
Soccer
Sports
Sports
Technology
Tennis
Thriller
Truck Series (TRUCK)
True Crime
Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC)
Uncategorized
US
Valorant
Western
Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA)
Women’s NCAA Basketball (WNCAAB)
World
World Cup Qualifier (WORLDCUP)
WTA Tour (WTA)
Xfinity (XFT)
XFL
0
-- Advertisement --spot_img
HomeCelebrityThe Phantom (8/10) Movie Review. Who killed Wanda Lopez?

The Phantom (8/10) Movie Review. Who killed Wanda Lopez?

Add to Favorite
Added to Favorite

 

The Phantom (8/10)

by Tony Medley

82 minutes.

NR.

On the night of February 4, 1983, a young woman working at a gas station in Corpus Christi, Texas, 26-year-old Wanda Lopez, called police to inform them that there was a Hispanic man outside her store that worried her. While still on the phone, he attacked and killed her while the police listened. He ran away but shortly thereafter police found 20-year-old Carlos DeLuna hiding under a car and eyewitnesses ID’d him as a man running away from the scene.

During the trial DeLuna identified Carlos Hernandez as the killer. Nobody believed him and summarily dismissed his claims. He refused a deal to accept life imprisonment without the possibility of parole in lieu of the death penalty, but he insisted on his innocence and turned it down. He was executed and to make matters worse, it was botched, and he suffered a lot during the execution.

In 2012 a Columbia University innocence project investigated and reported that DeLuna was telling the truth, that Hernandez not only performed the murder, but bragged about it.

 

 

This is a tough look at Texas justice, but it’s not just Texas. It’s an indictment of attorneys, and they deserve it. I’ve never been on trial for my life, obviously, but I have had to be represented in court by attorneys and the result has been almost uniformly bad. The lawyers who represented me were by and large incompetent, especially the ones from big firms. They lie and procrastinate and all they do is get their bills out on time. The last guy I had represent me was from a big firm and he was the worst (they seemed to get progressively worse); fortunately, I don’t anticipate ever being in court again as a litigant.

If what is shown here is true, this poor guy DeLuna had a lawyer who was lazy, if not incompetent; the prosecutors were more interested in an easy conviction than finding out who really did it, and DeLuna ended up dead. It took 20 years later to find out that there was an almost 100% probability that he was telling the truth and it was truth that could have been discovered, especially by the prosecutors, with just a little diligence.

This makes a pretty persuasive case for Deluna’s innocence, but it is basically one-sided. The fact, though, that he turned down a life sentence without possibility of parole is strong evidence that he was innocent. Had he been guilty, wouldn’t he almost certainly have chosen life over death?

Tony Medley is an attorney, columnist, and MPAA-accredited film critic whose reviews and articles may be read in several newspapers and at rottentomatoes.com, CWEB.com, Movie Review Query Engine (mrqe.com), and at  www.tonymedley.com.  His most recent book is “Learn to Play Bridge Like a Boss,” the most complete “all in one” book for beginners and also for advanced players. He is also the author of three books, UCLA Basketball: The Real Story, Sweaty Palms: The Neglected Art of Being Interviewed, the first book ever written on the interview for the interviewee and still in print after more than thirty years, having sold over a half million copies, and The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Bridge, which has sold over 100,000 copies. He is an American Contract Bridge League Silver Life Master and an ACBL accredited director.

Subscribe to get Latest News Updates

Latest News

You may like more
more

King Charles’s Christmas message recorded at former London hospital chapel, CWEB reports

King Charles III moved away from traditional locations such...

Earth Abides ( 2024) CWEB Official Cinema Trailer and Movie Review

Earth Abides: Movie Review In Earth Abides, Alexander Ludwig delivers...

Juror #2 CWEB Official Cinema Trailer and Movie Review

Juror #2 (8/10) Movie Review by Tony Medley Director Clint Eastwood...