Post a Free Blog

Submit A Press Release

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Action
Animation
ATP Tour (ATP)
Auto Racing
Baseball
Basketball
Boxing
Breaking News
Business
Business
Business Newsletter
Call of Duty (CALLOFDUTY)
Canadian Football League (CFL)
Car
Celebrity
Champions Tour (CHAMP)
Comedy
CONCACAF
Counter Strike Global Offensive (CSGO)
Crime
Dark Comedy
Defense of the Ancients (DOTA)
Documentary and Foreign
Drama
eSports
European Tour (EPGA)
Fashion
FIFA
FIFA Women’s World Cup (WWC)
FIFA World Cup (FIFA)
Fighting
Football
Formula 1 (F1)
Fortnite
Golf
Health
Hockey
Horror
IndyCar Series (INDY)
International Friendly (FRIENDLY)
Kids & Family
League of Legends (LOL)
LPGA
Madden
Major League Baseball (MLB)
Mixed Martial Arts (MMA)
MLS
Movie and Music
Movie Trailers
Music
Mystery
NASCAR Cup Series (NAS)
National Basketball Association (NBA)
National Football League (NFL)
National Hockey League (NHL)
National Women's Soccer (NWSL)
NBA Development League (NBAGL)
NBA2K
NCAA Baseball (NCAABBL)
NCAA Basketball (NCAAB)
NCAA Football (NCAAF)
NCAA Hockey (NCAAH)
Olympic Mens (OLYHKYM)
Other
Other Sports
Overwatch
PGA
Politics
Premier League (PREM)
Romance
Sci-Fi
Science
Soccer
Sports
Sports
Technology
Tennis
Thriller
Truck Series (TRUCK)
True Crime
Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC)
US
Valorant
Western
Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA)
Women’s NCAA Basketball (WNCAAB)
World
World Cup Qualifier (WORLDCUP)
WTA Tour (WTA)
Xfinity (XFT)
XFL
0
-- Advertisement --spot_img
HomeBusinessPhillips 66 Urges Shareholders to Reject Elliott’s Board Nomination

Phillips 66 Urges Shareholders to Reject Elliott’s Board Nomination

Add to Favorite
Added to Favorite


Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX), the American multinational energy company, has called on its shareholders to vote against the board nominations put forward by activist investor Elliott Investment Management. The board’s definitive proxy statement, filed on Tuesday, lays out a strong rejection of Elliott’s proposals, characterizing the activist’s campaign as short-sighted and based on unrealistic assumptions.
The Background
Elliott Investment Management, known for its multi-year campaign aimed at transforming companies through asset sales, operational improvements, and tighter board oversight, is seeking board seats at Phillips 66. The proposal marks the latest chapter in an ongoing dispute between the energy company and Elliott.
In its recent proxy statement, Phillips 66’s board emphasized that Elliott’s strategy is intended to force a quick breakup of the company, a move that the board argues would undermine Phillips 66’s long-term interests. The board contends that the proposed nominations do not align with the company’s vision for sustainable growth and robust governance.
What’s at Stake
Shareholders will cast their votes at the upcoming meeting on May 21, where Elliott’s nominees will face off against the current board. The board is urging investors to support the existing leadership, arguing that steady, long-term strategy is vital for navigating today’s challenging market environment. Among the key issues highlighted are:

Asset Divestiture: Elliott is pushing for the sale of certain assets, a move the board believes is premature and could destabilize the company.

Operational Performance: The board maintains that existing initiatives and investments are on track to deliver sustainable performance improvements.

Board Oversight: Strengthening board oversight is essential, but the board argues that the current governance structure is well-positioned to meet future challenges.

A Closer Look at the Proxy Statement
For investors seeking to review the details of the proxy statement and understand the board’s rationale, comprehensive filings can be accessed via the SEC Filings API. This resource provides up-to-date information on corporate disclosures and regulatory filings, allowing shareholders to make informed decisions based on the latest public records.
Final Thoughts
As the shareholder meeting on May 21 approaches, the debate over Elliott’s board nominations underscores a broader struggle over the strategic direction of Phillips 66. With the company emphasizing long-term stability and rejecting what it views as a disruptive agenda, investors are left to weigh the potential benefits of change against the risks of a premature overhaul of the company’s governance.
Phillips 66’s board remains firm in its stance, urging shareholders to vote against the proposed nominations and uphold a leadership structure that, they say, is best suited to guide the company through today’s complex economic landscape.

Subscribe to get Latest News Updates

Latest News

You may like more
more

Salem Media Group announces deal with Donald Trump Jr, Lara Trump, CWEB News reports

Camarillo, CA – Salem Media Group, a leading conservative...

U.S. Stocks End Turbulent Week With Strong Gains

Market Overview U.S. equity markets advanced on Friday, capping off...

Investors Slash Stock Exposure Amid Uncertainty, Yet New Money Flows In

Investors have cut their equity exposure to levels not...

Citi Downgrades U.S. Equities to Neutral Amid Mounting Uncertainty

Citi has downgraded U.S. equities from Overweight to Neutral,...