Nu Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:NU) showcases efficient capital utilization with a ROIC of 17.44% surpassing its WACC of 13.20%, indicating effective returns above its cost of capital.
StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) leads in capital efficiency among peers with a ROIC of 38.28% against a WACC of 11.30%, significantly outperforming others in generating returns over its cost of capital.
SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI), Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB), Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM), and Toast, Inc. (TOST) demonstrate varying levels of efficiency, with some facing challenges in generating sufficient returns over their capital costs.

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NYSE:NU) is a prominent digital banking platform in Latin America, offering a range of financial services including credit cards, personal loans, and savings accounts. The company is known for its innovative approach to banking, leveraging technology to provide accessible financial solutions. In the competitive landscape, Nu Holdings faces rivals like StoneCo Ltd. (STNE), SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI), Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB), Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM), and Toast, Inc. (TOST).
In evaluating Nu Holdings’ financial efficiency, the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is a key metric. NU’s ROIC of 17.44% surpasses its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 13.20%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 1.32. This indicates that NU is effectively generating returns above its cost of capital, showcasing efficient capital utilization.
Comparatively, StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) exhibits a remarkable ROIC of 38.28% against a WACC of 11.30%, yielding a ROIC to WACC ratio of 3.39. This positions StoneCo as the leader in capital efficiency among its peers, significantly outperforming others in generating returns over its cost of capital.
On the other hand, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) and Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) show lower efficiency. SOFI’s ROIC of 1.81% is overshadowed by a WACC of 16.35%, resulting in a ROIC to WACC ratio of 0.11. Similarly, GRAB’s ROIC of 1.02% against a WACC of 8.12% leads to a ratio of 0.13, indicating challenges in generating sufficient returns over their capital costs.
Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and Toast, Inc. (TOST) also face hurdles. AFRM’s negative ROIC of -0.85% compared to a WACC of 16.57% results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.05, highlighting inefficiencies. TOST, with a ROIC of 6.69% and a WACC of 13.37%, achieves a ratio of 0.50, also highlighting inefficiencies.