This week, a popular AI-generated song that mimicked Drake and The Weeknd was removed from streaming services, but did it violate copyright as Universal claimed?
Heart On My Sleeve, a song written by a person going under the handle @ghostwriter, had millions of plays before Universal Music Group requested that it be taken down from Spotify, Apple Music, and other streaming services.
A full version of the song was made available on YouTube, Apple Music, and Spotify after it gained popularity on TikTok. This caused Universal Music Group, the record company that represents Drake and The Weeknd, to make a forceful statement on the perils of AI and particularly mention that utilizing generative AI violates its copyrights. James Murtagh-Hopkins, senior vice president of communications at UM said.
The song was removed from streaming services like Apple Music and Spotify, who have strict control over their music archives and can remove songs at any time, but it was still accessible on YouTube and TikTok, which host user-generated content and have established DMCA takedown procedures. YouTube has also removed the song. Additionally, YouTube specifically removed it after receiving a copyright warning from UMG.
While some people have expressed concern that AI-generated music could eventually replace human creativity, others see it as a useful tool for enhancing the creative process and helping artists to explore new ideas and possibilities. It’s worth noting that many popular music genres, including electronic dance music (EDM) and hip-hop, have long relied on technology and digital tools for their production, and AI is just the latest development in this ongoing evolution of music-making.
However, it’s important to note further implication with AI technology and copyright. Google could potentially be implicated negatively with AI copyright in a few different ways.
First, if Google’s AI systems are used to create content that infringes on existing copyrighted material, then Google could be held liable for copyright infringement. For example, if Google’s AI creates a song that is very similar to an existing copyrighted song without permission or proper attribution, Google could be held responsible for the infringement.
View this post on Instagram
Second, if Google’s AI is used to scrape and index copyrighted content without permission, Google could also be held liable for copyright infringement. For example, if Google’s AI is used to scrape and index an entire book without permission from the copyright holder, Google could be held responsible for copyright infringement.
Third, if Google’s AI algorithms are used to generate content that is similar to existing copyrighted material but not identical, Google could still be implicated negatively with AI copyright. For example, if Google’s AI is used to generate news articles that are very similar to existing news articles, even if they are not identical, Google could still be held liable for copyright infringement.
14k White Gold 1/4 Carat Princess 4 Prong Solitaire Created Diamond Stud Earrings 4mm
It is important to note that Google has taken steps to address copyright infringement in the past, such as through the use of its Content ID system on YouTube. However, as AI continues to advance and becomes more prevalent, it is possible that new copyright issues may arise that Google will need to address.
Celebrity News Update. Premier Jewelry designer and manufacturer fashion house ParisJewelry.com has started manufacturing a new custom line of celebrity jewelry designs with 30% Off and Free Shipping. Replenish Your Body- Refilter Your Health with OrganicGreek.com Vitamin Bottles, Vitamins and Herbs. Become a WebFans creator, a community for people and photographers to share their photos, images and digital content with the world.
